the_siobhan: It means, "to rot" (Default)
the_siobhan ([personal profile] the_siobhan) wrote2007-09-18 11:29 pm

pleather thou?

I was thinking about something totally different tonight, and somehow two things converged in my head, and I started wondering.

How does the carbon footprint of leather shoes compare with those made out of petro-chemicals?

I think this popped up because I was reading about PETA's public statement that one cannot be an environmentalist while consuming animal products and then I started thinking about how I really can't see myself wearing clothes that are made of artificial fibres, and it kind of snowballed from there. Most leather comes from cows which are horrible for the environment. Artificial substitutes are made from a non-renewable resource, but the issue is less about running out of the stuff as it is what kind of mess we make using it.

So what do you think?

[identity profile] marchenland.livejournal.com 2007-09-19 04:51 am (UTC)(link)
I'm pretty sure that one one cannot be an environmentalist while consuming ANY mass-produced product.

A home-grown, home-killed, home-skinned, home-tanned boot would have a lower impact than a natural rubber and hemp shoe made in India and shipped to, and across, North America. PETA's argument, while essentially true, is disingenuous or, at least, over-reaching. But as consumers, we don't want to and frankly are not prepared to take back the means and modes of production. We have too much else to do; we have too little knowledge and access to the methods; we have the weight of social acceptance bearing down on us.*

These kinds of black-and-shite arguments (typo intended) make me crazy. At work, I am fighting with people to get them to use porcelain mugs for their coffee, and metal spoons. They have a millions excuses not to use renewable: they don't know where it's been (as if the plastic and paper alternatives were hermetically sealed before they used them); washing things wastes water (because you can compare water usage to landfills SO easily), it's not convenient (even though the receptionist runs the dishwasher for them so they don't have to "waste" time washing their mugs). I have not yet, but will soon, pull out the petro argument: every spoon you throw away takes a little more gasoline from your damn guzzling SUV.

The only TRULY environmental option, at this point, is to kill ourselves, if we want to be that specific about it. PETA can go first (and I say that as a nigh-vegetarian!), I'll watch. Or, we can step back from ridiculous zero-sum games and look at ways to change the entire system, not just the little pieces that please us most to change.

* You should see the looks of horror I get when I tell people that my dreads mean I don't have to wash my hair for 3-4 weeks at a time!

[identity profile] trystbat.livejournal.com 2007-09-19 05:37 am (UTC)(link)
At work, I am fighting with people to get them to use porcelain mugs for their coffee

A couple ppl at my office in the "green" group have quoted a variety of studies that say washing reusable coffee mugs saves no more & may waste more resources than using paper cups. I think they're smoking crack, personally.

It's like you can talk out both sides of yr ass & find stats to support it. Nuts. I've been using the same mug for 6 years, 2 coffees a day, dammit, that's a shitload of paper cups not wasted. And I just do it bec. I like my cup better!

[identity profile] marchenland.livejournal.com 2007-09-19 05:52 am (UTC)(link)
resources

I think that's our operable word right there. It depends on the resource being used, and not all uses are equal, or equally wasteful.

Utah is looking to go solar in a big way; while solar power isn't free from all harm, I think that the combined footprint of solar power and reusable water has GOT to make less of an impact than the production, transport, and disposal of paper and plastic cups. Of course, we're not there yet with the solar.

My mind boggles at how one could even begin to calculate that, though. (It reminds me a bit of the claims that nuclear energy is emmissions free -- by leaving out any information about emmissions!)

washing reusable coffee mugs saves no more & may waste more resources than using paper cups

I guess I'm also at a loss about "savings" vs. other benefits. Even if buying paper cups costs the same amount as buying the porcelain ones and washing them, in the long run, the landfill "savings" can't be calculated; I'm not sure anyone knows the ultimate cost of that yet. As part of the "green" group at my office, we have tried to avoid any questions of monetary savings. We feel that if we use savings as a benefit now, it may come back to haunt us later if something we want to implement does NOT save any money, or even costs more. We're taking as much of an ethical position as possible. Actually, Utah being full of people with lots of kids, it's not as hard to make the "for your children's children" argument here.

A friend whose house was built on a landfill recently developed severe allergic reactions which, after a year, mysteriously went away when her plumbing had some issues and she had to live elsewhere for a couple of weeks. No one knows why she's sick, what about her place is making her sick, or if it's affecting anyone else, but those are the kinds of "costs" that are probably impossible to track or quantify in any meaningful way.

I don't have any answers. I wish I did.

(I like my cup too. It's huge and purple and has a spider on it. I cracked it the other day and still REFUSE to stop using it.)
nitoda: sparkly running deer, one of which has exploded into stars (Default)

[personal profile] nitoda 2007-09-19 06:26 am (UTC)(link)
When you finally give up on your cup you can break it into pieces and use them as drainage/protection at the bottom of a plant pot - the pieces help excess water to drain so the roots don't rot while at the same time help keep the soil/compost in the pot. :-)

[identity profile] deliriumcrow.livejournal.com 2007-09-19 07:50 am (UTC)(link)
I have, in a few cases (like where the dish was irreplaceable for whatever reason -- like I was poor and had only the one left) superglued dishes back together and kept using them, provided the break was clean enough and I had all the pieces that made a solid edge. And as I've been doing this for years and have not yet died, I think it's safe. Seems to be dishwasher safe, too, given the most recent broken cup ... granted, this time it was only the handle, but several months later it's still attached.

I also maintain that if you're the only person using that cup and it's always being used for the same thing, as long as it isn't solid and full of grossness it really doesn't have to be washed every single time you use it. Once a day, maybe, if you're being fastidious. saves on water *and* on soap. And time. and effort. and time spent without coffee. :)

[identity profile] lil-m-moses.livejournal.com 2007-09-19 12:14 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree on the not washing, though I'm a bit more extreme. Then again, I'm also drinking tea and chai, not coffee. I only wash my mugs at work once or twice a quarter, usually when I'm washing the algae out of my Brita pitcher. I figure what doesn't kill me makes me stronger, and I haven't been appreciably sick in a year or more. =) They're not growing anything anyway.

[identity profile] marchenland.livejournal.com 2007-09-19 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Eh. I use dairy in my cup. 1 day later and it already looks like it's going to kill you. :(

But I reuse my water glasses for a week or so. Sometimes longer. And the cup I eat raw oatmeal out of goes for a month or so between washes.

[identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com 2007-09-19 05:42 pm (UTC)(link)
I do that with my water bottle and tea most of the time, but I'm wondering if washing with soap might not be a better idea from now on, given my current problems with my mouth. I may be re-introducing the very bacteria I'm trying to reduce.

[identity profile] sheepthief.livejournal.com 2007-09-19 12:25 pm (UTC)(link)
The only TRULY environmental option, at this point, is to kill ourselves

I've made the decision to not have children. Not for purely environmental reasons it has to be said. Still, it's remarkable how few people seem to see that as an environmentally sound choice.

(Anonymous) 2007-09-19 02:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I read that if every second woman chose to have 1 child instead of two, the population would decrease to 3.6 billion. If everyone has 2 children, the population will stabalize. This is really cool because it means people who want kids can still have them, they just can't be greedy about it. The problem is that there are groups of people who will have rediculous ammounts of children (think 16 to one household) out of religious and political reasons. I have heard some of the on the news say very plainly that they want to outbreed liberals. How's that for fucked up?

Jenn

[identity profile] marchenland.livejournal.com 2007-09-19 04:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I'm childfree as well, for various ethical and personal reasons.

(Anonymous) 2007-09-19 06:36 pm (UTC)(link)
My boyfriend is as well. It helps that he really just doesn't like children, though. I think it's cool that a lot of people are coming out and expressing this. To some people, those who choose not to have kids are evil, and they can't wrap their heads around it. They get their panties in a twist, and well, this makes me smile.

Jenn

[identity profile] 50-ft-queenie.livejournal.com 2007-09-19 07:56 pm (UTC)(link)
To some people, those who choose not to have kids are evil, and they can't wrap their heads around it.

Tell me about it. I've been called a child-hater, accused of hate speech, and told that I'm no better than a racist or a homophobe.

The kicker is that I don't hate kids or parents or parenthood. Quite the opposite.

(Anonymous) 2007-09-20 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
That's horrible. I'm sorry to hear that. Why is it only black/white with some people? Where either your a child bearing kid-lover, or your a childless kid-hater? I don't get it.

Jenn

[identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com 2007-09-19 12:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Good luck. I can't get people to walk five feet to the recycling bin to discard their aluminium cans.

[identity profile] marchenland.livejournal.com 2007-09-19 04:36 pm (UTC)(link)
We're actually doing pretty well. 9 of the 10 floors are recycling office paper after only a month (the 10th floor has it shredded, so I'm pretty sure they are recycling too); we use a company that actually pays US for the paper, and recycles it into insulation. We didn't recycle for 2 years because the company we had been using was too expensive, and the building manager thought no one cared!

We also have decent response to our plastic and aliminum recylcing bins in the kitchen. We take these home ourselves and put them in our own bins, but people are surprisingly good about it.

[identity profile] 50-ft-queenie.livejournal.com 2007-09-19 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
In our lunchroom at work, the recycling bins are *right next to* the garbage can, and people still throw their plastic and their pop cans into the garbage can.

It drives me nuts.