the_siobhan (
the_siobhan) wrote2004-03-21 03:30 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
a query for those who pay attention to these things
OK, so what are serial adders, and what's the deal with them?
('Cause I appear to have one, and I'm trying to figure out what the purpose of this is supposed to be.)
('Cause I appear to have one, and I'm trying to figure out what the purpose of this is supposed to be.)
no subject
Hey, speaking of adding...I just added you today, we have several mutual friends and I see your comments here and there and thought i'd add you...so "hi"!
no subject
I wondered about that, 'cause whenever I see them mentioned people seem to be annoyed.
But I don't see how it really affects me. I can make my posts friends-only if I don't want them to read me, so what's the diff?
This is a rhetorical question btw - I do that a lot. ;->
And hi back!
no subject
I get amused when people have hissy fits along the lines of "somebody I don't know added me so they are obviously STALKING me".
no subject
The difference beign is that I *am* stalking people!
no subject
(Well, I had one for a little while. But I told him what would happen if he didn't fuck off, so I think that spoiled it.)
no subject
I had a nacent stalker once, but then I started stalking them back, and they got all offended.
Thats more my style than cowering. It is also more amusing.
no subject
I like your style, sir.
no subject
no subject
Being able to delete people from your "friend-of" list by banning is only a recent feature, within the last week or so.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
that's hilarious. but, you need to watch 'angel'.
no subject
Good icon. =:-)
no subject
The best, most complete post about the The "Friend Of" Issue (http://www.livejournal.com/users/chr0me_kitten/436450.html) I've seen was in
I find it interesting that it's mostly been straight white people who don't have an issue with this.
no subject
no subject
For a while now people - well, some people - have been moaning to the powers of LJ that they had no control over who friended them, and that this Just Wasn't Fair. Whole host of reasons why people feel that way, of course - some valid, many just highschool drama or misunderstandings as to how the 'friends' system works.
Then someone started a petition, which you might have seen, complaining that they could be friended by "child molesters, rapists, murderers, thieves, spammers and hackers", that this wasn't against the Livejournal TOS, and that something had to be done. There was some discussion in
...and that's when we really started getting the serial adders. Usually with things like bestiality and pedophilia listed among their interests. Some of them are just gleeful trolls, but some of them are probably people creating a problem so they can justify a cure (everyone I know who posted on
Then again, I'm a cynical git so I would suspect something like that, wouldn't I?
no subject
I hardly ever break 40 in either direction. I just add people when their lives are interesting, read them for a while, and then remove them when I'm no longer interested.
My life is sufficently uninteresting that I don't get much traffic. =)
no subject
no subject
The way to get rid of them is the same as any other troll: ignore. Trolls feed on attention.
no subject
eden