the_siobhan (
the_siobhan) wrote2012-12-15 02:19 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
on recent discussions
Since this seems to be the topic on everybody's lips at the moment.
Of the people who have been arrested after a shooting spree, have any of them been diagnosed with a mental illness?
Of the people who were killed while on a shooting spree, is there any prior evidence that they were in fact suffering from a mental illness? (Let's assume just for the sake of this discussion that shooting a bunch of people does not in itself count as evidence.)
I see a lot of people on both sides of the gun-control argument saying that lack of access to mental health services is a causative factor in these shootings. So are people making that argument because the shooters are being diagosed after the fact, or is everybody accepting it as a given because "nobody sane would do that".
Of the people who have been arrested after a shooting spree, have any of them been diagnosed with a mental illness?
Of the people who were killed while on a shooting spree, is there any prior evidence that they were in fact suffering from a mental illness? (Let's assume just for the sake of this discussion that shooting a bunch of people does not in itself count as evidence.)
I see a lot of people on both sides of the gun-control argument saying that lack of access to mental health services is a causative factor in these shootings. So are people making that argument because the shooters are being diagosed after the fact, or is everybody accepting it as a given because "nobody sane would do that".
no subject
Of the people who were killed? I doubt it, they were kids.
gun-control argument
I guess, in Canada, you cannot have a sensible argument.
I guess, are there signs? Probably?
Is this a public health issue?
No, Crazy violent people are going to be crazy, violent.
You need to look at rates of crime in sensible areas, like here, to unpack the statistics.
When crazy violent people go crazy, when they have access to automatic weapons, there will be mass murder,
When crazy violent people go crazy, when they have not access to automatic weapons, there will probably not be mass murder.
It isn't an issue of crazy.
no subject
I guess, in Canada, you cannot have a sensible argument.
Why do you say that?
no subject
Proximity to the US gun nuts.
no subject
no subject
In light of this question, I kind of want to go back and watch Bowling for Columbine again. It didn't really answer things, but presented a lot of food for thought, and particularly on the difference in gun violence rates between the US and Canada.
no subject
no subject
I can't find any useful list of modern mass shootings in Australia (and massacres mixes in a lot of historical massacres, 'cause that was what you did with natives), so Wikipedia's os probably the best.
In terms of spree killers, the Milperra massacre is the only one that was front of mind, but I'm not Victorian, and that was a shoot-out.
Most of ours look to have been non-automatic weapons, but I'm hardly an expert in guns. We did have a spate of drive-buys this year, from memory they were associated to infighting between ethnic gangs in greater Sydney, but there are also reports of houses being peppered with shots that are never followed up.
I like our gun laws. There's no real need for semi-automatics, and there are quite strict requirements for gun safes, and licensing. I imagine, given that about 5.2% of Australian adults own guns, it is easy to perform inspections.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Australia
no subject