the_siobhan: It means, "to rot" (Default)
[personal profile] the_siobhan
Buying food from local sources is getting a lot of press lately, to the point that Axe & I heard a CBC feature on it while we were in the car. Which led to a conversation about the comparative benefits of eating an omnivorous but local diet vs eating vegetarian/vegan if your goal is to reduce your carbon footprint.

We're trying to reduce the amount of meat in our diet. But is it really helping if we cut down on the meat we buy - all raised in Southern Ontario - and replace it with vegetables shipped from all over the world?

(Of course the ideal is to go vegan and eat only locally grown organic foods, but just for the sake of argument.)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-12 12:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com
We already do that. That was the point of the discussion, are we really reducing our impact if we go from local organic meat to imported non-meat.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-12 11:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lilactime.livejournal.com
Ah, I see.

My understanding is that it's really not calculable. There's a reference to calculating food miles in The Omnivore's Dilemma and unless you know exactly where stuff comes from and what went into it, there's no way to figure precisely. The calculations done by the person in the book (not Michael Pollan but someone he interviews) determine that for the food he was eating, it's about even. If you were comparing local meat vs. local veg, then it would be obvious, but local meat vs. imported veg, my guess would be that they're fairly evenly matched in terms of impact.

Profile

the_siobhan: It means, "to rot" (Default)
the_siobhan

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags