the_siobhan: (Brighter Blessed Than Thee)
Questions of Days )


***

Problems only goths have: losing clothes whenever I do laundry because every single thing in the laundry basket is black. I'm missing a bunch of socks and I'm pretty sure they accidentally got folded into my bedsheets.

Guess I'll find them next time I make the bed.

***

I crossed sorting out the "medicine cabinet" off my list - it's actually a dresser drawer where we just toss things we don't have an immediate need for or where we have bought more than one container of something.

Things I discovered in the process.
  •     A pack of nicotine gum that expired two years ago
  •     One of those truck-stop energy shots that expired three years ago
  •     A pack of nicotine patches that expired four years ago
  •     A pack of allergy meds that expired five years ago
  •     A bottle of ear-drops that expired six years ago
  •     A pack of famotidine tablets that expired in 2007
  •     A prescription jar of cortisol cream from 2002.
  •     Three packs of sharps
  •     And a partridge in a pear tree
Something suggests I should do this more often.

***

We got another air quality warning today, but I went outside and the air didn't smell like a campfire, so I took the risk of sitting on the patio for a while.

I read this article recently about how Ontario is having trouble keeping experienced fire fighters because the bill that restricts public employee's pay includes fire fighters and so people are saying "Fuck this, I can have a job where I'm not living in a tent for a month while I risk my life for shitty pay."

And here's the thing, we have so many fires going on in this country right now that the federal government is shipping people in from other countries to help. I have seen videos of South Africans arriving in Alberta. Spanish and Portuguese fire fighters are in Quebec. There are French and American teams in northern Ontario.

So let me get this straight, the provincial government cuts the funding to the firefighting program, cuts the pay of firefighters, cancels the carbon tax, sells large portions of the green belt to developers, cancels green energy programs, and builds a new fucking highway that we don't need right through our core farm country - and then federal money has to be used to fly people in from other countries to fight fires exacerbated by climate change?

How the fuck does this make any kind of sense?


the_siobhan: (What Would Jaques Cousteau Do?)
Still alive.

Occasionally I see posts by people who say, oh sorry I've been so quiet, I've been doing all my posting on this other site. Not me, nope. I go quiet because I suck on all social media.

***

The Old Man really really really wanted to do a dinner out with the family and I just couldn't bring myself to say no to him again yet again. I made a point of getting him his flu shot a couple of weeks ago because apparently this year's flu is a fucker, and then last night we took him out to a steak house. I was thinking I could reduce the risk by doing it 1) midweek, 2) before December started proper and 3) before office Xmas parties and family get-togethers make the numbers sky-rocket. Well #1 & 2 didn't come through for me because the place was packed. And then at the last minute the nephew couldn't come because he tested positive for covid.

Still, the Old Man said he really enjoyed himself. When spring comes we'll do it again at an outside venue - hopefully with the nephew this time - and if we can make that our new tradition I'll feel better about saying no to winter indoor gatherings. I should have done more of that this past summer, but he spent most of it in the hospital. He's in good spirits and good energy now though, so hopefully that lasts.

***

Tomorrow we drop of the bed that we finally got for him. Holy shit those things are expensive. I mean it makes sense they would be, they have to be sturdy enough not to break on people and the mattress is pretty high-tech, but still. Even so it will still be cheaper than the rental.

I am behind on so many things. My to-do list is a fucking joke, seriously, it's one of those cartoon things that has pages stapled on the bottom and just spreads all over the floor when you pick it up.

My to-do list includes writing and phoning politicians because things are a nightmare in Ontario right now. I had an argument with the housemate yesterday about how yes, voting matters, because if we weren't spending so much energy struggling to stop the Conservatives from making things worse, maybe we would have the energy to push to make things better? They made the counter-argument that this province always chooses one of the two big main parties and always the one that isn't in the federal seat - so struggling against the Conservatives is never going to not be a thing on some government level and we should just focus our energy elsewhere. They have a valid point I think, but also you gotta start somewhere, so yelling at politicians is still an item on my daily planner, because honestly I have the time equivalent of 2.5 full-time jobs now and that's what I can manage.

***

I'm trying to get back into Write Every day. Dear Lord. My brain is like the Sahara. I've been trying to write a story from the perspective of a person who struggles with depression which you would think would be easy for me, but it's surprisingly difficult to put the experience to paper.

So I was thinking about it one night when I was lying-in-bed-not-sleeping and it occurred to me that for me at least, depression has always really been about anger. So if I can write a character who is just quietly fucking furious all the time I might get closer to what I'm trying to express.

Could be an interesting exercise, if nothing else.

***

So yeah. Same old, same old over here.



the_siobhan: (BOOM)
A lot of the Canadians on my reading list are talking about this story

Canadians are deeply concerned about climate change and are willing to make adjustments in their lives to fight it — but for many people, paying as much as even a monthly Netflix subscription in extra taxes is not one of them, a new poll suggests.


I call bullshit.

Because I know what I would answer if a pollster asked me the question.

I would answer, "We know the names of the people who right now are making billions piloting the industries causing climate change. We know who is funding the misinformation campaign designed to convince people that climate change isn't real and protect them from the repercussions of their actions. We know the names of the politicians and the lobbyists who are responsible for the de-funding of infrastructure that makes it harder for the rest of us to live sustainable lives *cough*Doug Ford*cough* and the ones who buy pipelines and give subsidies to oil companies while wrapping themselves in a green flag *cough*Trudeau*cough*.

Taxpayers are already paying more - in medical costs as air quality goes down, in insurance costs as flooding & fire increases, in having to pay to put fucking air conditioning I don't even want in a house that just keeps getting hotter every year. Take the money from the oil companies, strip them of every last fucking penny of company profits and use it to clean up their crap. Their shareholders and CEOs can have whatever is left when they've paid for the mess they made."

And that would be recorded as a "no".
the_siobhan: (wormtooth)
Back in court with all the other rejects. Apparently everybody else has also figured out that these things never start when they tell you, I wandered in at quarter past and I was one of the earliest to arrive.

It's also quite comfortable in the waiting room today. I guess a building this massive just takes a while to cool off after a weekend of sitting empty.

*************************


I am so utterly done with this place and this climate. I'm spending $60 a month on medication just to try and breathe. I am done with feeling like I've inhaled a wet sweat-sock. I'm done with not being able to sleep, and migraines and skin rashes from the fucking heat.

We spent the first 10 years in this house using nothing fans and that was enough. But each year the summers get hotter and longer and I just can't fucking do it any more. And Canada obviously doesn't give a shit about anything but extracting as much money out of the ground as possible to make sure oil companies continue to turn a profit.

I don't even like air conditioning but it's now moved to the head of the list of things to spend money on the next time we have some[1]. I just wish to fuck I could charge the cost to the fuckers who just cancelled all the wind and solar projects.



[1]Ha ha ha ha. That's a whole 'nother rant.
the_siobhan: (NaDruWriNi)
At one of our previous laptops&beers sessions somebody asked the room, "Do any of you have any opinions about Earth Day?"

Hoo boy, do I have opinons about Earth Day.

The first year it went international, Axel & I took part. We turned off our lights, lit some candles, sat around in our creepy living room with the plastic hanging off the bricks because we had no walls, drank a bottle of wine and talked. And it was nice, a little break in the middle of a hectic life.

The next day there were tons of news articles about how many people had taken part. How so many major cities, mine included, had seen major energy use dips. The number of people who participated put the event on the map in a big way. I let myself feel a tiny shred of hope, the sneaking suspicion that maybe we weren't totlaly fucked. Not because an hour of low energy use means squat - it doesn't. But if that many people had demonstrated that climate change was important to them, it couldn't help but be a flag to government and business that hello, WE GIVE A SHIT ABOUT THIS SIT UP AND PAY ATTENTION DAMN YOU. MAKE. A. FUCKING. CHANGE,

Ten years later I no longer participate.

Ten years later, my workplace - which has investments in the oil sands - puts an planet earth logo on their intranet site and encourages their employees to celebrate Earth Day by going for a walk during our lunch break.

Businesses all over town promise to dim their lights for an hour. Immediately after, of course, they go back to being fully lit up all night and causing bird genocide all summer long.

Earth Day is now a performance by marketing companies and PR hacks for the benefit of companies who want to convince people to give them their business becasue "they care". And I no longer bother to participate.




Drink List: A bunch of beers, four maybe? Plus a very strong g&t.
the_siobhan: (on fire)
So because my co-workers are lovely, they got me going-away presents. One of them was a pie, which was delicious and they helped me eat it.

The other part of the present was a gift card for Indigo, which is a Canadian book store. "Aha!" says I, "I can finally buy some of the books that are on my wish list." And because we are trying to reduce the number of Things, I went online and created an account on the Indigo website and bought the electronic version of some of the books I wanted.

Now the Indigo e-reader is called a Kobo. When I buy the books the Indigo website ports me over to Kobo to create an account there. This concerns me a little as I don't have a Kobo, I have a Kindle. Not to worry, says the website, you can convert the files using a free Adobe app. So I download the Adobe app. Then I try to convert them so they can be read on my Kindle. Adobe app says nope, those files have DRM. I do a search on the Adobe website, which says, well if you register your Adobe app you can share the files across devices. Fine, I didn't particularly want to have to create yet another account with a third company, but whatever. I register the Adobe app. I download the books again. Adobe app says that's nice, now you have two copies of the files but they still have DRM so I can't put them on your Kindle.

Axel downloads a DRM-breaker. DRM breaker says it could convert the files if it were the previous version of the Adobe app but not this new version.

We collectively say fuckit and torrent the fucking books.

Keep in mind that these are books that I legally purchased, and would like to be able to read on an existing e-reader that I already own, and after hours of nonsense we still couldn't get them into my Kindle. It took all of three minutes to just download an illegal copy, convert it, and bam I'm good to go.

And this is why people pirate shit.
the_siobhan: (on fire)
There is a point, when one is flying by the seat of one's pants and barely maintaining altitude, where the stress just goes away and replaced by a sense of "Ha ha what else could possibly catch fire today."

I think I've hit that point three times already this week, and it's not even 2 PM.
the_siobhan: (Dufferin station)
Today's commute was an utter crapfest. I was coming in from D's place in the east end of town so I had to take the subway instead of my usual bus[1]. Six trains went by, all so full that there was no space to squeeze more than a single body into each open door.

At that point I went to the opposite platform and took a train going the wrong way until I got to a station far enough from the core that I could finally switch to one going the direction I wanted.

This is such bullshit. We needed a downtown relief line 20 fucking years ago. But taxes are bad, right?




[1] The bus that D calls "the honey badger". Because it just doesn't give a fuck.
the_siobhan: (Kurt Vennegut Jr)
So here's a situation I haven't run into before.

Among the books I have been trying to work my way through, I have some that are a part of a series. The whole point of me doing this is to whittle down the books we have here, so rather than buying the ones that are missing I looked to the library.

And the library has them. But they are "reference only". I can't check them out and read them at home.

The hell? I have never run into this before with books that are fiction. Is this a new thing? Why would fiction be reference only if it's not something like the first edition of Dracula?




(Dog Wizard by Barbara Hambly and Child of the Northern Spring by Persia Woolley in case you were wondering.)

[ETA] BTW, when I say "The Library" I mean the entire Toronto Library network - I don't just mean one building. I think that's a local colloquialism, not just me who using that nomenclature.
the_siobhan: (What Would Jaques Cousteau Do?)
I ended up having a gastroscopy yesterday - fortunately the doctor's office called me to remind me, with everything that's been going on lately it completely went out of my head.

It's something I have to do every couple of years for monitoring but it was my first time getting it done by this particular doctor - she's the same one who took out my gallbladder. The experience was very different. The previous doctor would knock me out and I would wake up feeling like I had swallowed a couple of yards of sandpaper. This time I was given a local and some gas and was completely conscious through the whole thing. I can tell you it feels weird as hell to have a hose going in and out of one's stomach. But my throat feels absolutely fine.

Whatever gas they gave me made me feel so sleepy I kept nodding off in Darrell's car while he was driving me home and and he ended up putting me to bed shortly after we got there. The rain started while I was sleeping and I woke a couple of hours later to find a large puddle on the window sill next to me. I cleaned that up and went downstairs just as Axel got home from work.

The two of us were noodling away on our respective computers and I started pointing out pictures people had posted of flooding all over Toronto. Then I recognized one of them as being from an railway underpass just south of our house. You could just see the tops of the cars poking over the top of the water.

We looked at each other. "Hey, have you been down in the basement yet today?"

Oddly enough, the bedroom was fine - there is a wooden floor built on top of the concrete and so it's just raised enough to prevent any damage. Every other surface was covered in water and mud. The storage room is also raised but obviously not as much, the water got into the low shelves where Axel had all his records stored.

So right now we have anything paper spread out over piles of towels to dry on our living room floor. Stuff that was in cardboard boxes and that we figure we can deal with later - like clothes that will need to be laundered - are propped up on tops of the plastic bins that survived the flood. Everything is covered in mud. It looks like a few lighter objects actually floated for a while as there are a lot of small things that travelled across the room. We have towels and tarps thrown across all the entry points so we don't track mud through the rest of the house.

It's just another day in the Once And Future Gin Palace.
the_siobhan: (BOOM)
Let's propose a hypothetical situation. Pay careful attention, there's a quiz at the end.


Unidentified individual #1: Engages in inappropriate behaviour at a work event that is specifically prohibited in his employer's code of conduct.

Unidentified individual #2: Responds to and also participates in inappropriate behaviour at a work event that is specifically prohibited in his employer's code of conduct.

Unidentified individual #3: Notifies a corporation that behaviour is taking place that is specifically prohibited in their (the corporation's) code of conduct.

Unidentified individuals #4 - #1000: Send online threats of assault and murder to a single targeted individual. Members of this group also engage in harrassment by launching DOS (denial of service attacks) to one or more online service providers.

Unidentified corporation #1: Fire one of their employees for engaging inappropriate behaviour at a work event that is specifically prohibited in their (the employer's) code of conduct.

Unidentified corporation #2: Fire one of their employees for receiving online threats of assault & murder and for being targetted by DOS attacks.



So here's the quiz part.

Question: Who in this cast of characters behaved in such a way that they should receive the most public criticism for their actions and choices?

Answer: The woman.
the_siobhan: (Dufferin station)
I could have sworn I made a post about the trains behind our house, but I can't seem to find it. Oh well, if I did you get to hear about it again.

Anyway, our back yard ends where the CN/CP rail corridor starts. Legally we have no rear access to our property but our neighbours are pretty enthusiastic about finding creative work arounds to that and our "fence" is really just a bunch of boards and old doors hammered together. When we moved in our backyard was protected by a broad swathe of trees and some pretty heavy underbrush. All the wildlife I keep finding in my backyard took advantage of that thicket to travel along the rail corridor. It also provided a very efficient noise baffle against the sound of the passing trains.

Since then the province has decided to build a direct rail between the downtown and the airport and the obvious spot to put it was in the corridor behind our property. Fair enough, it's something we need. Heavy machinery appeared behind our house and about half the trees were cut down in order to make space for the new rail. They also put up this weird silver box that "chirps" every 2 minutes and that gets covered with fresh gaffiti every week or so.

Since the original plans were announced there have been a couple of things that have gotten the locals up in arms. One is that they are planning on putting in deisel trains instead of electric, which seems really stupid given that these are high-frequency passenger shuttles travelling a total of 30 km. Our objections have been answered with, "Oh we'll convert it to electric five years later," which sounds even dumber to me since it would require spending the money twice (or at least one-and-a-half times) on the same thing.

The second thing that is pissing people off is that they have decided to build a 15-foot wall along the entire length of the rail line. As a noise barrier. One would assume against those frequent-service deisel engines that people have said they don't want.

When I got up this morning there were people working on the rail lines chopping down the last of the trees behind my property. You know, those trees that I mentioned were so great at blocking the noise of the trains going by. I guess that's where they're going to put the wall.
the_siobhan: (What Would John Constantine Do?)
Something I was thinking about today.

(It involves death & suicide so take note if those things disturb you.)

Most of the people I know are sympathetic to the idea that a person has the right to end their life under certain conditions. The typical scenario being where one has a fatal illness such as cancer, where all medical options have been exhausted and when the quality of life can no longer be maintained in a way that the individual finds meaningful. In fact a number of people have told me that they plan to commit suicide if they ever find themselves in such a situation, preferably before they are completely incapacitated by pain and physical deterioration.

I can't say if this is typical of society at large, but most of the people I interact with don't have a problem with that.

So why do so many people have the exact opposite reaction when it comes to mental illness?

I was thinking about the friends I have lost to suicide over the years. In a couple of cases it was well known that they suffered horribly from depression that was resistant to all medical intervention. They struggled for years, decades. And when they finally gave up, their friends were all furious with them.

I don't really get the difference between the two reactions. Giving up on an incurable painful illness that impacts the body is obviously being measured on a different scale than giving up on an incurable painful illness that impacts the mind. And I don't really get why. (I get why people would put them on a different scale when it comes to making the decision for themselves, it's their friends' reactions that I'm quizzing.)

Anybody think they can explain the thought process there?


NOTE: Not considering suicide as an option for me. Just in case anybody misunderstands the purpose of this conversation.
the_siobhan: (Kurt Vennegut Jr)
The rule I decided on for sorting through my books was that if I ever wanted to re-read it I could keep it. Otherwise it goes out the door. Some books I can tell you the answer right away. Some I have to leaf through a bit or read the first chapter. Since I have so many books this process is taking a while. I have also filled two big boxes where the answer is, "Yes, but only the once." So these are the books I am now reading right away.

One of the ones I just finished is a paperback so old it is held together by an elastic band. It was published in 1964 - I was a year old. The events it describes as happening in the near future are already 20 years in the past.

That makes it kind of an interesting read even without discussing the worth of the writing itself. But what really jarred me out of the story was the language used to describe Africans and Asians - they were referred to as Negroids and Mongolians. There were two characters in the story with birth defects, both were called mongoloids by other characters. This was not the author trying to be cruel, this was the accepted polite nomenclature in the year the book was written.

In 2012 those words feel either archaic or give me an emotional wince that makes it hard to focus on the story. Since the early 60s the word "mongoloid" became an insult and an epithet and so we don't say it any more. It was replaced by the much more kind and scientifically accurate term "mentally retarded".

Except that now "retarded" is an insult too. So we've replaced it with... Developmentally delayed, I think? Mentally challenged? Neuro-atypical? Is it fucked up of me that I'm not even sure? I know I've heard "delayed" thrown around as insults recently, so if those terms are considered socially acceptable now I imagine they won't be for long.

And this right there is a big part of why I find changes in acceptable language to be problematic. The problem is not with the words. The problem is that dicks will treat a group of people as if they are an insult just by existing[1]. You can change the language as often as you want, the shit-heads will change right alongside you and pollute any new term you come up with.

I don't have a solution for this. Fewer shitheads I guess. Except I don't see that happening any time soon either.






[1]This post is brought to you by Ann Coulter and by the people who think they are insulting Ann Coulter by making jokes about how she used to be a man. You are not on my side.
the_siobhan: (Brighter Blessed Than Thee)
I usually try to limit my Facebook use to short quips and sharing of music videos and online petitions. I just like the blog environment a lot better for having more in-depth conversations. But every once in a while I post something that generates a lot more comments than I was expecting. The "newsworthy women of 2012" post started off like that.

So I made a post on FB a few weeks back. It went like this;
Public support for alcohol prohibition in North America was largely spear-headed by women's groups who believed that it would stop men from spending the grocery money on booze and then coming home drunk and beating up their wives. Of course prohibition laws passed and incidents of domestic violence did not decline. It must have been a bitter realization for them.

I think of those women every time I hear an atheist claim that human society would feature less injustice, intolerance and violence if only we could get rid of religion.

So it did generate a lot of comments, mostly a debate about whether or not religion could be considered to be a bad influence. Which was interesting, but not really what I was going for. (Although I have to confess, I did immediately start picturing the exact same conversation happening between a group of women 150 years ago; one side presenting example after example of Good Men Who Had Gone Over To The Drink, and the other side arguing they knew plenty of people who could have a tipple without turning into a monster. But I digress.)

So anyway, saving that for a separate post. What I was really getting at was wanting to point out that taking away the things that influence people to turn into douchbags won't magically get rid of assholes. Being an asshole is one of the things that humans have evolved to be very good at.

But of course if I'm being honest it's not as simple as that either. We aren't islands, standing tall and proud in the strength of our convictions. We are influenced our entire lives by family, environment, peers, experiences, popular culture, things we read, genetics, the perceptions and expectations and treatment we get from other people.

I remember when I was a kid being absolutely incensed when my parents decided that one of my friends was a "bad influence". How dare they assume that I was so weak-minded and easily led that I couldn't be a fuck-up all on my own. But the people we surround ourselves with are both picked because they share our values and also give us the feedback that says are values are the correct ones. When I go out of my way to behave in ways that are seen as positive I get kudos from my peers. When I fuck up, I get called on it. That's what peer pressure is all about, and that's the reason that one of the most common conditions of probation is that you not hang around with your old friends. As per my previous sentence about my friends calling me on my shit, it can also be a powerful force for good - assuming we all agree on what constitutes "good", that is.

But yet some people can walk away from that. I know a ton of people who have left their family or their birth religion or changed their political affiliation because they perceived injustice in how other groups were treated. That can't be easy. I have read many stores written by people who spent time in white supremest groups, who grew up in "quiverfull" communities, who were surrounded their whole lives by a belief system and yet abandoned everything they knew in favour of what they felt was right. Hell, I once read an interview with Randall Terry's mother where she identified as a feminist. Look at how much good that did him.

So where is the line? What makes the difference between behaving a certain way because it's all you've ever known and behaving that way because it is truly a part of who you are? How does holding people accountable for their actions as individuals intersect with the acknowledgment that they are immersed in a culture that reinforces and encourages some of the worst parts of human nature?

I have my own take on the answers to those questions but I'm still mulling over how to clarify them. You take a stab at it.


(This post was brought to you by the Iron LJ Retro Challenge. It was originally posted on FB, but Axel explains what it's about here.
the_siobhan: (What would Jean Chretien Do?)
I've been mulling over a conversation I had with my dad when I was at his place recently. I was ranting about our Honourable Wife-Beating Drunk-Driving Mayor (as I so often do) and how the hell could anybody actually be convinced to vote for the incompetent fuck. I am pretty strongly of the opinion that anybody who campaigns on the promise that they can lower taxes while simultaneously pretending that they won't then have to reduce the stuff that taxes pay for should instantly be disqualified from any position in public office. Because they are either too bad at math to be able to perform adequately at their job or they are just flat-out lying.

So my dad has this theory that part of the problem is that advertisers have been busy telling us for the last four-five decades that we can get stuff for free. "First month is free." "Free trial." "Buy two get one free." Of course everybody knows that none of this stuff is actually free. The cost is just getting shuffled onto something else. But the message has been drilled just a little further into our heads every time we've been exposed to radio or television. And now politicians have figured out that if they promise us stuff for “free” or for less money (taxes) then people will vote for them. Even though we should know that it's impossible. Even though it didn’t work any of the other times we voted for people who made us the same impossible promise.

Advertisers spend an awful lot of time and money figuring out how to get us to do stuff that we wouldn't otherwise do. I'm still thinking about this.
the_siobhan: (blowfish)
You know, as much pushback as the "Do You Want To Be A Mermaid Or A Whale" poster has gotten, I think it's a really good metaphor for the beauty industry.

Because, you know, mermaids are fictional.
the_siobhan: It means, "to rot" (Default)
I have never been one of the Pretty girls.

Before anybody starts thinking this is a sudden onset of self-esteem issues, let me be perfectly clear that this statement has absolutely nothing to do with my appearance. The face in the mirror has it's good days and it's bad days, but mostly I'm pretty cool with it in a "It-may-not-be-perfect-but-it's-mine" kind of way. It appears that some pretty hot people also seem like my face just fine and I'm certainly not about to argue with that.

This statement is about identity.

When you're growing up people give you labels. Adults do it. Other kids certainly do it. And when I was growing up the label I got from everybody around me was The Smart One. The bookworm. The one who was destined to go to University.

My younger sister - now she was The Pretty One[1]. And man, was I envious. But the older I get, the more I think I really dodged a bullet by not getting that label slapped on me when I was young and likely to really internalize the things that other people thought of me. And let me be perfectly clear about this, I strongly internalized the way I was perceived. I don't know if it would be possible not to internalize the terms that people use to describe you, the qualities they praise you for, the thing that dictates the very way they relate to you.

The reason that I've learned to count myself lucky is quite simply because as I get older the things that people use to define me as "smart" don't really change all that much. I had to gave up precocious in return for a little wisdom-from-experience, but that's about it. Assuming I escape dementia or a debilitating head injury, I will probably get to continue thinking of myself as smart right until the end of my life. If my designated label was "creative" or "funny" or "green" I could probably say much the same thing.

But "pretty" is one of those labels that means some very specific things in our culture. And one of those very specific things is being young. And for the lucky ones, being young is something you eventually stop being.

That's the nasty fucking trick that gets played on the Pretty girls. It gets planted into their psyches that they are The Pretty One before they are even old enough to know what that means. It gets reinforced by the way they are treated by others the first 30-odd years of their lives - and people do treat others differently based on their perceived attractiveness judging them as more competent, more intelligent, nicer. It's held up in magazines and movies as both the ultimate goal and the natural state of all women. People treat them better or worse based on their appearance.

And then our culture starts to slowly peel away the very identity that's been pushed onto these women for the majority of their lives. No matter how accomplished intelligent, or surrounded by love a person is, no matter how many additional layers of "self" she has built for herself over the years - losing that first one? That's going to sting.

And I was lucky enough to escape all that.

I don't have to lie about my age. I can watch the gradual flowering of laugh lines across my face with fascination (and admittedly little trepidation). I can eschew expensive spas, painful injections, dubious skin treatments and creams that come in teeny tiny little bottles. I can eat what makes me happy and move my body solely to make myself feel good. I don't wax anything.

But man, suggest that you think I'm dumb? I'll probably eat your face.



[1]Years ago my sister said to me, "You know, when we were kids we were The Smart One, The Pretty One and The Nice One. Now we're The Weird One, The Fat One and The Bitch." I howled.
the_siobhan: It means, "to rot" (Default)
I have a couple of glasses of wine in me and I"m still thinking about "drama". (Seriously, if I quit drinking, what the hell am I going to use for inspiration?) From my point of view, drama is essentially conflict. But by my definition of the term, it's not conflict that's being dealt with directly.

During a recent somewhat beer-sodden conversation with a friend, said friend expressed some trepidation about the reactions that might have to be dealt with at an upcoming party. Without speaking for another person or pretending to be a mind reader, my impression is that said friend doesn't really give a rat's ass what other people think - but also doesn't like to be in the centre of a fuss. So I told Friend my philosophy of conflict, and finding oneself in the centre therein.

Which is that when people are pissed at you, they tend to have one of three reactions.

1. They don't tell you.

Maybe they put a high value on just getting along. Maybe your trespass wasn't that high on their internal list of Shit One Does Not Do so it's just not worth the hassle of getting into a discussion about it. Whatever their reasons, I figure if they won't tell me about it what they are really communicating is that it just ain't my problem. Next!

2. They don't tell you but they tell everybody else.

There are gradations of this behaviour. I think everybody indulges in it in it's mildest form. I don't think I've met a single person in my life who never did something I disagreed with, and I'm no so perfect that I'm above saying, "What the hell was X thinking?" in private conversations. In it's most poisonous and unhelpful form, it results in broken confidences, spreading rumours and telling lies. And if somebody does that, they are a) an asshole and b) not my friend. And if people believe the lies and don't talk to me about it, they are a) assholes and b) not my friends either.

And if they aren't my friend, why should I give a flying fuck at a rolling doughnut what some bunch of assholes think of me? Next!

3. They have a problem with you and they tell you about it.

Then you get to have a conversation. Even if it goes badly, at least then you know where you stand.

Just to be clear, I'm not dismissing the pain of losing actual friendships. That sucks no matter how it goes down. I'm thinking specifically of the kind of weird group social interactions that only seem to have become possible since the invention of the internet, which created a unique environment where of dozens of people can now all have a hissy-fit over the same thing at the same time. And since the invention of LJ, they can now also friends-lock it.

Even so, I'm aware that I'm probably unusual in my response to these things. I made a conscious decision that I Don't Care What Other People Think back in high school, and I've never regretted it once.

I'm inventing a new astrology. I've decided that one of the signs will be Bull in China Shop.

Profile

the_siobhan: It means, "to rot" (Default)
the_siobhan

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 23456 7
89101112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags