the_siobhan: It means, "to rot" (Default)
[personal profile] the_siobhan
Anybody who spends any time hanging out with me knows that I am brutally allergic to cigarettes. Over the last ten years my allergy and my asthma has gotten to the point where I can't be near the stuff at all - even the stale smoke coming off the clothes of somebody I'm sitting next to can have my lungs contracting in protest.

But I don't react nearly as strongly to pipe or cigarette smoke. If I get it blown in face I get about the same amount of a reaction as I would to getting a face full of street dust. In fact I've smoked the odd cigar and enjoyed it. Which leads me to believe that I'm not actually allergic to tobacco, but to something in the curing process or additives that are specific to cigarettes.

A few years ago there was an anti-smoking ad that showed a couple of teenagers diving into an oily-looking pool while a text-over listed all the toxic ingredients that are found in cigarettes. Tar. Formaldehyde. Ammonia. Now I don't know how many of those things are also found in other tobacco products or are just a by-product of burning leaves and twigs and bug-poo and sucking them into your lungs, but it's a well-known fact that cigarette manufacturers add all kinds of glop specifically intended to make the things more addictive.

And I gotta wonder, why do we let them?

Everybody knows quitting smoking is hard, whether you've actually ever smoked or not. At this point I think I've still known more people who have successfully quite heroin or cocaine than I've know people who have successfully quit smoking, and it's not like I've spent a lot of time hanging around with illegal drug users in the last decade. Yet we still allow manufactures to lace their product with toxic chemicals that are specifically designed to make it harder.

Given the amount of money that we fork over through our taxes on health care, wouldn't it make more sense to tell the cigarette companies to knock that shit off and stop trying to poison us?

And maybe if they did I'd be able to sit next to my friends on a bar patio again.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-09-15 09:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marchenland.livejournal.com
Huh. Now I feel bad for smoking on the back patio when you were visiting. :(

I currently only smoke "natural" cigarettes (Kretek's Natural Dreams and, in a pinch, American Spirits, although I'm the kind of smoker who can go without rather than smoke a cigarette I don't like), which claim that they don't have additives. I don't know that I believe them on this, but I like the brand a lot. I'd be curious to know if those set you off as well. (You could be, like, our own personal coal-mine canary! "Hey, is this one really natural?")

(no subject)

Date: 2007-09-16 01:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com
I have a friend who quit smoking by stepping down from regular cigarettes to the American Spirit ones - he said he went through a bitch of a withdrawal when he switched over and was smoking three packs a day to deal with the jonesing. When he got over that and was down to a pack a day again, he quit cold turkey. And had a much milder withdrawal.

So just from that I'd say there's a difference.

I've never been exposed to the Natural Dreams (unless that's what you were smoking in SLC, and I honestly don't remember if they bothered me) and the few times where I've been around people who were smoking American Spirit there have been tons of other people also around smoking their own brands at the same time. It would certainly be an interesting experiment.

Profile

the_siobhan: It means, "to rot" (Default)
the_siobhan

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213 14151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags