one for the "Right. On." files
Mar. 22nd, 2006 09:19 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Story yoinked from
kightp.
So it was all over LJ and the news when South Dakota and Senator Bill Napoli banned abortion even in the case of rape.
The latest development is that now Sioux tribal President Cecelia Fire Thunder has offered to open a Planned Parenthood clinic on the Pine Ridge reservation to serve South Dakota women.
kathrynt got permission from President Fire Thunder to post contact info in case anybody wants to send donations to help out.
I expect to see this all over the blogosphere by tomorrow. Ha! In your face Napoli!
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
So it was all over LJ and the news when South Dakota and Senator Bill Napoli banned abortion even in the case of rape.
The latest development is that now Sioux tribal President Cecelia Fire Thunder has offered to open a Planned Parenthood clinic on the Pine Ridge reservation to serve South Dakota women.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I expect to see this all over the blogosphere by tomorrow. Ha! In your face Napoli!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 02:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 03:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 03:09 am (UTC)http://wildcherrygal.livejournal.com/55275.html
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 03:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 03:37 am (UTC)But more amused at this gaping loophole in the law.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 03:48 am (UTC)It's not actually a loophole - it's a seperate entity. South Dakota can no more make laws over tribal land than they can over North Dakota.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 03:52 am (UTC)Ah. That makes perfect sense now.
Still, thinking on it what does this flaw in the South Dakota plan actually achieve? I thought the whole rationale behind the law was to force the US Supreme Court into reconsidering and (in theory) over-turning Roe v Wade and then allowing the individual states to ban abortion?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 04:03 am (UTC)What it means to RvW, I don't know.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 04:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 04:27 am (UTC)The big concern would be if states made it illegal to cross state lines to obtain one.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 04:30 am (UTC)Or Mexico.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 02:51 pm (UTC)I also think that it would be very tough to justify a state law making it illegal for a woman to go to another state an engage in activity that is legal in that state - I can see a state trying it, but I cannot see such a law withstanding any sort of Constitutional scrutinity if challenged.
This whole thing makes my stomach turn, but cheers to President Fire Thunder.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 04:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 04:11 pm (UTC)Y'all explained it better than I think at least 50% of my fellow countryfolk could.
Pardon me while I go drown my sorrows in some tea, now. :P
(Speaking of which, anyone know a good source for snarky political icons?)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 09:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 03:39 am (UTC)ROTFL!
Date: 2006-03-23 10:28 am (UTC)Re: ROTFL!
Date: 2006-03-23 04:17 pm (UTC)Re: ROTFL!
Date: 2006-03-23 09:02 pm (UTC)On the other hand, when I'm awake it's likely to be 2 am in South Dakota.