the_siobhan: It means, "to rot" (Default)
[personal profile] the_siobhan


Stolen from [livejournal.com profile] divine

I just wrote an email to the Governor General. I tried not to use too many exclamation marks.

Awesome, awesome, awesome, awesome, awesome!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 05:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] panic-girl.livejournal.com
One more awesome from me.

P.S. The Facebook statuses from my Alberta people are very amusing, as you can well imagine.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 07:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] inulro.livejournal.com
Heh. I'm guessing fewer exclamation points.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 09:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ravensee.livejournal.com
One more from me.

Change, it's what's for breakfast.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-03 12:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] canticle.livejournal.com
I put up with it every day at work. You'd think there was a military putsch taking place. There are actaully people advocating violent overthrow of any coalition should it occur to 'protect democracy'. Anyone in this Province advocating it is pretty much asking to be beaten up.

I tend to just ask people how 37% became a majority in a democracy to shut them up.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-03 12:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] panic-girl.livejournal.com
There's no rally planned in Calgary. 'Nuff said.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 05:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] griffen.livejournal.com
Okay, I'm a dunce... what does this mean?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 05:25 pm (UTC)
erik: A Chibi-style cartoon of me! (Default)
From: [personal profile] erik
I'm not Canadian, but I think it means a new election.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 05:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] panic-girl.livejournal.com
Nope.
There's a good rundown here (http://spacing.ca/wire/2008/12/02/tuesdays-headlines-72/) under the "Federal Coalition" heading. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 05:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] panic-girl.livejournal.com
Or Sio will be able to explain it. Heh. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 05:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com
The exact opposite - the parties that came in second, third and forth in the election in October will form a clear majority under the coalition so it will eliminate the need for another election.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 05:45 pm (UTC)
erik: A Chibi-style cartoon of me! (Default)
From: [personal profile] erik
Ah! That is awesome!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 05:56 pm (UTC)
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
From: [personal profile] redbird
Awesome, and with little precedent. Harper keeps trying to play chicken, and has just discovered what happens when the other players don't blink.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-03 05:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tide-and-time.livejournal.com
Unless of course the Vice Regent refuses to dissolve the Government and allow this in which case Stephen Harper can then have her dissolve the Government and declare an Election.

Considering that the last time this occured in 1926 the Vice-Regent aka Governor General of that era refused the opposition parties request it is very likely the current one will do so as well.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-04 03:35 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I think it will depend on how much popular support the coalition can muster. I think she's unlikely to veto if the public can convince her that we want it.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 05:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hirez.livejournal.com
Your quiet neighbours from the far north are going to load up on Tim Horton's and Molson, then drive south and torch the Whitehouse. Again.

Run while you still can.



(Probably)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 05:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channonyarrow.livejournal.com
Better do it quick - I don't think you want to cross Rahm Emanuel. *g*

Seriously, though, as I understand this, that's awesome!

Now if you'll excuse me I'm gonna go get lost in fantasies of what it might mean if Canada and the US aren't being led by complete cocktards. It's...it's an amazing thing. I think there are butterflies and puppies.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 05:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com
Our election in October resulted in a reinstatement of a minority government led by the Conservatives. They got less than half the votes, but more than anybody else.

This time round the other three major parties are offering to put aside their differences and form a majority government under the Liberal leader (whose party came in second) The Governor General of Canada, who is basically the Queen's rep, gets to say nay or yea. I just wrote to her to say OMGYES CAN HAZ GOVERNMENT THAT ISN'T THE DEVIL NOW PLZ!

I'm particularly thrilled by this because the Prime Minister of the coalition government is a major environmentalist and the Conservative leader is pro-global warming.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 06:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] inulro.livejournal.com
and the Green Party are backing the coalition!

(I have gone away and done my reading and OMG HOLY CRAP!!!! I remember the Joe Clark minority gov't falling, but that's nowhere near as cool as the hostile takeover method.)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 06:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com
Good for them!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 06:27 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I'm thrilled at this, however there are a lot of people who are taking this as an attack against democracy. They feel they voted for the conservatives who got elected, and they feel it's being taken away from them I can sympathize to a degree. Still, I feel all the power in government shouldn't belong exclusively to one party anyway. Besides, how can this current gov. represent all it's citizens who didn't vote for them. It's nice to see people actually DOING something!

Jenn

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 06:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com
Then they are stupid.

60% of people voted against the Conservatives. This coalition represents 60% of voters who chose another party. It's a more democratic arrangement than having the country ruled by a party who received the biggest minority of votes.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 08:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sloot.livejournal.com
On Tuesday Oct 14, before going to bed, a lot of people felt that democracy had not done it's part in installing Harper as PM.

The people who were sad on Oct 14 are happy now, and the people who were happy on Oct 14 are sad now.

There's slightly more of us than them though ...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 05:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] inulro.livejournal.com
I had no idea that was coming. That's what neglecting my Canadian news media gets me.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 05:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 50-ft-queenie.livejournal.com
Excellent! I would grin if I wasn't all numbed up by Novocaine.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 05:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] girfan.livejournal.com
Looking at the photo with my glasses on meant that I read the first person was Celine Dion. Doh!


Good news? I'm afraid my Canadian government knowledge isn't up to par.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 06:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com
Very good news.

The latest stunt pulled by the Conservative party - taping private meetings being held by the NDP and releasing the tapes to the media.

Only it backfired on them because most of the content of the tapes was the NDP party members discussing what options would be best for Canada. And surprisingly the public takes a dim view of wire-tapping your opponents, who knew?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 08:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sloot.livejournal.com
I know, that was hillarious.
SH: Look what we secretly recorded them saying!
public: you secretly recorded them?
SH: yeah, yeah, whatever, look what they said!
public: you fucking secretly recorded them!
SH: no, you don't understand, they're bad
public: you're evil!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 06:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elixxir.livejournal.com
It isn't dated. I know it's really anal of me but how can you say you respectfully request anything 'today' without dating it?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 06:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com
Good thing I have done my civic duty by posting the image where it is effectively time-stamped.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 07:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] panic-girl.livejournal.com
Ha! I love your brain.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 07:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/cincinnatus_c_/
I thought that too. I also thought that this looks like it might be the last page of a longer letter. It is, after all, a bit abrupt--such as to make its "respectfully" look disingenuous, if there isn't any more to it.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 07:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elixxir.livejournal.com
Yeah, not to rain on anyone's parade but I find it difficult to imagine official government correspondence being that sloppy. My first thought way to question whether it was real. I'm a real ray of sunshine like that.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 07:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] panic-girl.livejournal.com
I thought that too. I did see it up on the CBC site, so I know someone on LJ didn't just slap it together in Photoshop. But as to how legitimate it is, I have no idea. Still, it looks NEAT. :P

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 08:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 50-ft-queenie.livejournal.com
I've seen it on other major news outlets too, including the Globe and Mail, so I think it's fairly legit. I do keep thinking it looks like the final page of a longer document and I've been trying without success to find out.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 07:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/cincinnatus_c_/
Personally, I'd rather have an election, and keep having elections if need be. I understand how unpopular elections are these days, though, so I guess having elections is undemocratic. ;P

I'm uneasy about what changing governments like this will do to the country. I don't mean what the coalition itself will do; sure, I'd rather have a Liberal-NDP(-Bloc) coalition than a Conservative government, all other things being equal (although obviously there is a good chance that the coalition would be a farce, which would heighten the probability of a Conservative majority in the next election, though there would be a good chance it would not be led by Harper. It might also be the push that the NDP needs to finally overtake the Liberals, which I think might be a mixed blessing at best.) I mean that the West wanted in, the West got in, and now the East is conspiring to kick the West out again. I suspect the Western Block Party is going to become a lot more popular. I can't imagine it ever leading to (some part of) the West actually separating, but living indefinitely with Western resentment can't be good for the country.

I wonder if (and hope that) one result of all this might be to make some left-leaning Quebecois nationalists, including Duceppe, think that maybe it might be time for the Bloc to get the hell out of the way. Duceppe has obviously come around to the view that the Conservatives have outlived their de-centralizing usefulness, and since sovereignty is really no longer on the table, the best way to serve Quebec's interests (not to mention the generally leftish politics of most sovereigntists) would be the old-fashioned way, through the Liberal party--or, even better, through a new Liberal-NDP formation....

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 09:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kudzu.livejournal.com
Hahaha!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 09:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylmak.livejournal.com
Definitely the best news of the year. The General Governor is on her way back to Canada as we speak.

All in all, if this comes to pass (which I'm very hopeful it will, as no one wants another election so close after the one we just had), North America will again become a beacon of democracy and freedom, with the coalition here in Canada and Obama soon to take office in the US.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 09:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] panic-girl.livejournal.com
There's a rally.
http://makeparliamentwork.ca/

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 11:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com
I AM EXCITED ABOUT POLITICS!

RAWK ME AMADEUS!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 11:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] panic-girl.livejournal.com
HA HA! Yeah! This is a bizarre feeling. ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 11:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ravensee.livejournal.com
I am always proud to be Canadian. Today, extra so.:)

It's time for the Log Driver's Waltz

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-03 01:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kambriel.livejournal.com
Wow, what a year this has been so far, politically! It's about time :)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-03 03:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] excess-and-oohs.livejournal.com
the graphic designer in me says that is terribly photoshopped. i have no idea what it's about, but it looks fake to me.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-04 03:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-siobhan.livejournal.com
What makes you say that? The original image is from the CBC, they aren't in the habit of using photoshopped images.

only took 4 minutes to do

Date: 2008-12-04 04:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] excess-and-oohs.livejournal.com
Image
Edited Date: 2008-12-04 04:37 pm (UTC)

Profile

the_siobhan: It means, "to rot" (Default)
the_siobhan

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213 14151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags