in a nutshell
Oct. 1st, 2009 10:21 pmYou know I've really liked a number of Roman Polanski films.
That doesn't in any way change the fact that he's a fucking asshole.
(Woody Allen,Terry Gilliam, David Lynch, Martin Scorsese, Tilda Swinton - that makes you assholes too.)
That doesn't in any way change the fact that he's a fucking asshole.
(Woody Allen,Terry Gilliam, David Lynch, Martin Scorsese, Tilda Swinton - that makes you assholes too.)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 07:12 am (UTC)Being such a relativist is really annoying. Sometimes, I long for a good, hard opinion unmitigated by "maybes" and "what ifs," and "but thens" and so on. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 01:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 02:03 pm (UTC)I think it may also be relevant in understanding why the French exonerate him. They officially don't consider what he did to be a crime, as I understand it. I think understanding the cultural view of ages of consent is the only way to understand that. Otherwise, what conclusion can we draw of the French?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 02:17 pm (UTC)The French are assholes?
Hey, I've held that view for awhile now :P
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 05:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 05:21 pm (UTC)but my beef with them is personal
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 05:25 pm (UTC)How can you?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 05:42 pm (UTC)More generally and related, I find the overall attitude of the French towards predatory sex of older men upon younger women a bit off-putting. I'm well aware it's not a Universal view, but the culture as a whole is much more comfortable with it than I am as a survivor of such a situation.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 05:47 pm (UTC)Obviosuly I didn't, and your LJ is blank. But I am assuming you are an ex-AGer.
In any case I did say "wacist". Which is funny in and of itself.
I can't even begin to discuss the "predatory sex of older men" in France since I am male and only spent a few days in Paris.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 05:51 pm (UTC)Yeah, I posted as Angelsil 'back in the day'.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 05:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 06:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 07:01 pm (UTC)(and, believe you me, he knows what I think of his "Motherland")
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 04:06 pm (UTC)See I don't really give a rat's ass about his relationship with Kinski. I might find it oogy, but from all accounts it was consensual. My "asshole" opinion is based solely on what he did to Samantha Geimer.
I should probably have been clearer about that up front, but you know. Punchy headlines trump accuracy.
I think it may also be relevant in understanding why the French exonerate him. They officially don't consider what he did to be a crime, as I understand it. I think understanding the cultural view of ages of consent is the only way to understand that. Otherwise, what conclusion can we draw of the French?
That they've been told he's being extradited for having an affair with Natasha Kinski?
Actually, do we even know that "the French" do exonerate him? I see a lot of French names on the petition, but I also see a lot of American names and I'm not sure I would take that as proof that "the Americans" exonerate him. I'd be curious to know what the actual majority opinion is.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 05:27 pm (UTC)Less officially the French in general think that he should be given special accord as an artist and not made to serve time for such an old crime. Time has an excellent article on the differences in cultural perceptions.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-03 12:00 am (UTC)http://www.courierpostonline.com/article/20090929/NEWS01/909290352/1001/NEWS/-France-rushes-to-defend-Polanski--public-disagrees
"Many newspaper readers responded with angry comments on the newspapers' Web sites lashing out at France's government and cultural leaders. One comment in Le Figaro read: "Our so-called intelligentsia lacks modesty, restraint and impartiality when one of its own has behaved badly."
So maybe not so much.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-02 05:03 pm (UTC)