Scenes from the gender wars: part I
Jan. 22nd, 2005 07:37 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
In a post I made a couple of weeks ago, there was a casual reference to a friend who got hassled for breastfeeding in public.
Well, there's more to the story than that. And it hasn't ended yet.
First of all, some background info. For those who don't know, women have the right to be topless in Ontario. It's considered a discrimination issue, if men can show their nipples in public then it is discriminatory to prevent women from doing the same thing. I think the wording of the original court decision contained some language about it not being done with obvious sexual intent but I'll have to look that up later.
On top of that there is specific language in the Ontario Human Rights Code about breastfeeding itself. The actual text contains the following paragraph;
Seems pretty straightforward right? So when E was approached at a family event while trying to feed her daughter (12 days old at the time and having a little trouble getting the hang of this nursing thing) and pressured to move elsewhere, she refused. Instead she fired off an email to the contact address of the organization asking for an apology and some assurance that volunteers would be educated as to the contents of the Code.
It should have ended there. Instead turns out that the person in question is the organizer of the "family" events and she refuses to admit that she did anything wrong. So far she has published E's email to a public yahoogroups list, I assume looking for backup from the members. She has posted her breastfeeding policy for the events in organization's newsletter. She has posted a public archive of all the emails and public messages on the groups website. She has attempted to bully my friend, misrepresented what happened and flat-out refused to back down. Most of the details of who did/said what/when/to who are written about here and here.
All to avoid having to make one lousy apology.
So now the city counseller for the riding has gotten involved, the city has made a statement about their policy on breastfeeding, the city department of Parks has been contacted and there may very well be a Human Rights Case. And hundreds of women (and a few men) have offered to come to the park and whip their shirts off in a show of support.
Personally I have huge amounts of admiration for E, who is sticking up for herself and her principles in spite of the fact that she needs all this stress like she needs a hole in her head. And absolutely amazed that this Mason person can't see past her own ego long enough to realize that she fucked up.
Oh yeah, and the patrionizing way Mason writes about "the public space quilt" makes me want to yak.
Well, there's more to the story than that. And it hasn't ended yet.
First of all, some background info. For those who don't know, women have the right to be topless in Ontario. It's considered a discrimination issue, if men can show their nipples in public then it is discriminatory to prevent women from doing the same thing. I think the wording of the original court decision contained some language about it not being done with obvious sexual intent but I'll have to look that up later.
On top of that there is specific language in the Ontario Human Rights Code about breastfeeding itself. The actual text contains the following paragraph;
"You have rights as a nursing mother. For example, you have the right to breastfeed a child in a public area. No one should prevent you from nursing your child simply because you are in a public area. They should not ask you to "cover up", disturb you, or ask you to move to another area that is more "discreet"."
Seems pretty straightforward right? So when E was approached at a family event while trying to feed her daughter (12 days old at the time and having a little trouble getting the hang of this nursing thing) and pressured to move elsewhere, she refused. Instead she fired off an email to the contact address of the organization asking for an apology and some assurance that volunteers would be educated as to the contents of the Code.
It should have ended there. Instead turns out that the person in question is the organizer of the "family" events and she refuses to admit that she did anything wrong. So far she has published E's email to a public yahoogroups list, I assume looking for backup from the members. She has posted her breastfeeding policy for the events in organization's newsletter. She has posted a public archive of all the emails and public messages on the groups website. She has attempted to bully my friend, misrepresented what happened and flat-out refused to back down. Most of the details of who did/said what/when/to who are written about here and here.
All to avoid having to make one lousy apology.
So now the city counseller for the riding has gotten involved, the city has made a statement about their policy on breastfeeding, the city department of Parks has been contacted and there may very well be a Human Rights Case. And hundreds of women (and a few men) have offered to come to the park and whip their shirts off in a show of support.
Personally I have huge amounts of admiration for E, who is sticking up for herself and her principles in spite of the fact that she needs all this stress like she needs a hole in her head. And absolutely amazed that this Mason person can't see past her own ego long enough to realize that she fucked up.
Oh yeah, and the patrionizing way Mason writes about "the public space quilt" makes me want to yak.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 12:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 01:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 01:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 08:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 01:42 am (UTC)"Public space needs compromise, friendly negotiation, a willingness to bend, even when one's precise rights are not followed to the letter."
Huh? So, as long as the Queen Prude of the Park wants you to bend to her will, your human rights are irrelevant?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 01:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 07:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 10:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 01:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 01:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 03:47 am (UTC)/US libertarian pov
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 03:48 am (UTC)Juttaa poor young hockey player. ;)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 04:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 02:11 am (UTC)Re: Scenes from the gender wars: part I
Date: 2005-01-23 03:04 am (UTC)making the original email public, including E's full name is ... man, i can't express just how offensive i find it. (even though i also think that E's original could have been a little less threatening to start with, regardless of her being completely correct about her rights.)
yeah, the Park Prude has a giant ego problem. the way she writes of how supportive she is of breastfeeding (as long as done, you know, in a way she considers modest enough) makes it pretty clear that she thinks her morals are the only right morals. "public space quilt" my hairy white ass.
Re: Scenes from the gender wars: part I
Date: 2005-01-23 07:18 am (UTC)Re: Scenes from the gender wars: part I
Date: 2005-01-24 03:52 am (UTC)Re: Scenes from the gender wars: part I
Date: 2005-01-24 04:21 am (UTC)Mason really chose the wrong person to pick on that day. Sounds like Mason has had this coming for a while. I was reading in Lixx's journal about how Mason hassled a "non-park regular" for walking her dog in Dufferin Grove, and warned her not to come back.
Re: Scenes from the gender wars: part I
Date: 2005-01-24 11:19 pm (UTC)that's pretty heavy hitting in my book. i would have not involved the city at that original stage. (after the newsletter, i would have, but maybe that wouldn't have happened. hard to say now.)
i am sorry E's had to deal with so many problems during her pregnancy, but i don't think ms. mason should have to bear the brunt of that. note that i think she was entirely out of line with her request; i just also think that E brought a howitzer to bear in response.
Re: Scenes from the gender wars: part I
Date: 2005-01-24 11:39 pm (UTC)I don't think Mason is bearing the brunt of anything. Mason's request was illegal, pure and simple. She had no business making that request, and I'd wager a lot of money that E is not the first nursing mother she's harassed.
note that i think she was entirely out of line with her request; i just also think that E brought a howitzer to bear in response.
I am not E, but I believe her intent was to convey to the park organizers that she expected them to take her complaint and her requests seriously. Far too many women, esp. pregnant and post-partum, get brushed off as "crazy" or "hysterical", which is an adjective Ms. Mason was more than happy to throw around.
Re: Scenes from the gender wars: part I
Date: 2005-01-26 05:32 am (UTC)*shrug*. i don't blame E in the least; i've already said that i thought mason was out of line, but you asked what i considered threatening, and there you are.
as to your bet, i would think that with the amount of publicity this has been getting, said nursing mothers would by now have come out of the woodwork. maybe it was just a single instance of a basically decent if somewhat prudish person overreacting. i'm not ready to crucify her for that -- but i damn well think she should apologize, issue a retraction to her "rules for breastfeeding mothers", and work on her attitude about what's "decent".
Re: Scenes from the gender wars: part I
Date: 2005-01-23 07:22 am (UTC)She strikes me as somebody who has publically recognized for doing Good Things and has had so much coummity support for so long that when she actually screws up she can no longer recognize it.
"public space quilt" my hairy white ass.
*cracks up*
Re: Scenes from the gender wars: part I
Date: 2005-01-23 03:32 pm (UTC)If Canada had a human spaceflight program, I'd so totally emigrate. =/
Re: Scenes from the gender wars: part I
Date: 2005-01-23 10:18 pm (UTC)Re: Scenes from the gender wars: part I
Date: 2005-01-24 03:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 03:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 07:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 04:02 am (UTC)Seriously, I grew up in a household with almost weekly LLL meeting. I can't think of a bodily function or method of dealing with infants in a variety of cirumstances that is LESS offensive.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 06:50 am (UTC)e has been my hero for a long time. this only reinforces that fact.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 07:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 11:31 am (UTC)fucking puffed up powermad volunteer. cow. what makes me sick is all her crap about being flexible, and yet she can't see that the smaller amount of bending would be for her to look the other way, rather than the breastfeeding mother to go and sit in the bloody toilet.
grrr...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 01:36 pm (UTC)Not to make light of the situation, but does the organizer in question happen to be related to anyone in the Bush regime?
It sounds par for the course ... " doesn't matter how obviously wrong I am, dammnit! I am not wrong! "
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-23 03:23 pm (UTC)I've been raging on a slow boil abotu this and I'm not quite sure when I'm going to blow up and at whom... I wouldn't want to waste ammo.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-24 12:30 am (UTC)Civil Court!!!
Date: 2005-01-23 04:34 pm (UTC)But this is coming from someone who lives in the highest litigation area of the States.
However, my support is there. Kick the stupid bitch's arse!!!
Dee
Date: 2005-01-23 11:18 pm (UTC)